An analysis of the Russian S-70 “Okhotnik” flying-wing unmanned combat air vehicle, which was shot down on October 5, 2024, near Kostyantynivka in Ukraine’s Donetsk region, has revealed that despite international sanctions, the aggressor state used components manufactured by Western companies to build this advanced weapon.
The findings underscore the ongoing challenges in enforcing sanctions aimed at limiting Russia’s access to critical technologies.
The examination of the downed S-70 drone showed that its construction included microelectronics and other technological components from well-known Western manufacturers such as Analog Devices, Texas Instruments, and Xilinx-AMD from the United States, as well as Infineon Technologies from Germany and STMicroelectronics from Switzerland. These components were identified in detail and cataloged by the website “War & Sanctions,” which specifically documents all foreign-made parts found in destroyed or captured Russian military equipment.
The S-70 “Okhotnik” represents one of the most advanced unmanned systems in Russia’s arsenal, designed to carry out both strike and reconnaissance missions. The drone, which incorporates technology from Russia’s Su-57 fifth-generation fighter jet, aims to operate alongside manned aircraft, providing additional capability in contested environments.
October 5th marked the first confirmed loss of an S-70 Okhotnik in combat, reportedly a result of friendly fire over the occupied Donetsk region. Initial footage and reports circulated on social media showed Russian forces mistakenly targeting the heavy stealth combat drone, highlighting the growing complexities in UAV operations over Ukraine. At present, only a limited number of prototypes of the S-70 Okhotnik exist, making the loss particularly notable for Russian military planners.
The use of Western components in the S-70, despite extensive sanctions, underscores a critical weakness in the enforcement mechanisms designed to limit Russia’s military capabilities. Analysts point out that the continued presence of these parts in Russian advanced systems points to gaps in international supply chains and enforcement of restrictions.
The findings published by “War & Sanctions” are part of a broader effort to document foreign involvement in Russian military development, often through unauthorized channels and under questionable circumstances.
