The future of the United States Air Force’s Next Generation Air Dominance (NGAD) fighter jet program hangs in the balance as the incoming Trump administration signals potential shifts in defense priorities.
The NGAD, envisioned as a sixth-generation combat aircraft to replace the F-22 Raptor, has faced scrutiny over its projected costs and feasibility.
Originally unveiled in September 2020, the NGAD demonstrator has been described as a cutting-edge platform integrating advanced stealth and combat technologies. However, with an estimated price tag exceeding that of the F-35, concerns about affordability have intensified, especially as rival nations like China accelerate their own advancements in military aviation.
Recent footage of Chinese combat aircraft prototypes, reportedly developed as part of Beijing’s efforts to gain air superiority, has added urgency to the U.S. Air Force’s NGAD timeline. Nevertheless, questions remain about whether the program’s high-cost, high-capability approach aligns with the incoming administration’s defense objectives.
Elon Musk, a prominent advisor to President-elect Donald Trump and vocal critic of traditional manned fighter jets, has openly questioned the relevance of such programs in the era of advanced unmanned systems. “The F-35 design was broken at the requirements level,” Musk stated on his social media platform, X. “Manned fighter jets are obsolete in the age of drones anyway. Will just get pilots killed.”
This perspective aligns with growing calls within the defense community for a shift toward unmanned or hybrid combat systems that leverage artificial intelligence and automation.
Air Force Secretary Frank Kendall acknowledged the challenge of managing costs for the NGAD program during the Air, Space & Cyber Conference earlier this year. He suggested that design modifications, including adjustments to range, payload, and engine configurations, could bring the fighter’s cost below the $80-$100 million threshold set by the F-35.
One proposed solution involves integrating Collaborative Combat Aircraft (CCA)—autonomous systems designed to perform specific mission functions alongside manned aircraft. These CCAs, with a target price of $25 million per unit, could reduce the NGAD’s overall burden while preserving its effectiveness in contested environments.
“We haven’t set a number or threshold,” Kendall told reporters. “But managing costs is critical to ensuring the program’s long-term sustainability.”
While the Trump administration has yet to announce an official position, defense analysts suggest that the NGAD program’s future may depend on its ability to deliver cost-effective capabilities. There is speculation that the administration could redirect focus toward developing a lighter, more versatile fifth-generation-plus fighter instead of pursuing the ambitious NGAD concept.
The potential pivot has sparked debate within military circles about balancing innovation with practicality. Supporters of NGAD argue that maintaining air superiority requires investing in the most advanced technologies, while critics highlight the program’s expense amid broader budgetary constraints.
As the Trump administration prepares to take office, the fate of the NGAD program will serve as a litmus test for the U.S. Air Force’s ability to adapt to changing priorities and emerging global threats. For now, the question remains whether the NGAD represents an essential leap forward in military aviation or an untenable gamble on high-tech warfare.
