Musk warns US military must change course or face failure

Billionaire entrepreneur Elon Musk has once again taken aim at U.S. defense spending, questioning the cost-effectiveness and strategic direction of American military programs.

His latest remarks come in response to a report from the Congressional Budget Office (CBO), which revealed that the U.S. Navy plans to allocate $40 billion annually for the next 30 years, totaling $1.2 trillion to maintain and expand a 364-ship fleet.

Musk, who has frequently criticized the U.S. military-industrial complex, called for a complete overhaul of how the country develops its weapons systems.

- ADVERTISEMENT - CONTINUE READING BELOW -

“American weapons programs need to be completely redone. The current strategy is to build a small number of weapons at a high price to fight yesterday’s war. Unless there are immediate and dramatic changes made, America will lose the next war very badly,” Musk wrote.

Musk has been a vocal critic of costly and slow-moving U.S. military projects, often contrasting them with the agility and efficiency of private-sector innovation. His comments reflect broader concerns within defense circles and Congress about the rising costs of procurement, the aging fleet of U.S. warships, and the need to adapt to emerging security threats from adversaries like China and Russia.

The Navy’s projected $1.2 trillion spending plan aims to expand its fleet while replacing aging vessels, a move that Pentagon officials argue is crucial for maintaining maritime superiority. However, critics, including Musk, argue that high costs, long development cycles, and bureaucratic inefficiencies are hampering innovation and flexibility in modern warfare.

The U.S. military faces a growing challenge from China’s rapidly expanding navy, which has already surpassed the U.S. in terms of total warships. The People’s Liberation Army Navy (PLAN) is investing heavily in new shipbuilding programs, hypersonic weapons, and advanced electronic warfare capabilities.

Musk’s remarks align with concerns from some defense analysts and lawmakers, who argue that the current U.S. strategy of procuring fewer but highly expensive warships may be unsustainable in a future conflict. The cost per ship, averaging $3 billion, has raised questions about whether the U.S. should pivot toward a larger fleet of smaller, more cost-effective vessels that could operate with greater flexibility in contested waters.

Musk’s comments reinforce ongoing debates about the future of U.S. military procurement and modernization efforts. He has previously advocated for greater reliance on autonomous systems, drone warfare, and AI-driven military technologies—fields where companies like SpaceX and Tesla have demonstrated rapid advancements.

While Pentagon officials continue to push for a balanced approach to fleet expansion, Musk’s remarks highlight a growing divide between defense traditionalists and proponents of disruptive innovation in military strategy. As the U.S. Navy moves forward with its long-term investment plan, the debate over cost, efficiency, and technological adaptation in defense spending is likely to intensify.

If you would like to show your support for what we are doing, here's where to do it.

If you wish to report grammatical or factual errors within our news articles, you can let us know by using the online feedback form.

Executive Editor

About author:

Dylan Malyasov
Dylan Malyasov
Dylan Malyasov is the editor-in-chief of Defence Blog. He is a journalist, an accredited defense advisor, and a consultant. His background as a defense advisor and consultant adds a unique perspective to his journalistic endeavors, ensuring that his reporting is well-informed and authoritative. read more

YOU MIGHT ALSO LIKE

TRENDING NOW

Ethiopia and Eritrea edge closer to all-out war

Officials and regional experts warn that longstanding tensions between Ethiopia and Eritrea could lead to renewed warfare, posing a significant threat to the fragile...