- U.S. Central Command conducted self-defense strikes on May 25, 2026, eliminating two IRGC Navy mine-laying boats near Larak Island and striking a missile site in Bandar Abbas.
- CENTCOM spokesman Capt. Tim Hawkins confirmed four Iranian naval personnel were killed; two U.S. sources said the strikes do not indicate the ceasefire has ended.
While American diplomats worked to broker a peace deal with Tehran, American pilots were eliminating Iranian boats caught laying mines in the Strait of Hormuz. The two tracks ran simultaneously on Monday, May 25, and neither canceled the other out.
U.S. Central Command confirmed that American forces conducted what it called self-defense strikes in southern Iran on Monday, targeting missile launch sites and IRGC Navy speedboats caught in the act of emplacing sea mines near Larak Island at the mouth of the Strait of Hormuz. CENTCOM spokesman Capt. Tim Hawkins confirmed four Iranian naval personnel were killed when U.S. jets eliminated both vessels.
“U.S. forces conducted self-defense strikes in southern Iran today to protect our troops from threats posed by Iranian forces,” Hawkins said in a statement. “Targets included missile launch sites and Iranian boats attempting to emplace mines. U.S. Central Command continues to defend our forces while using restraint during the ongoing ceasefire.”
Fox News national security correspondent Jennifer Griffin, citing a senior U.S. official, reported additional details: two Iranian boats were caught laying mines, the U.S. military eliminated both IRGC vessels, and American aircraft also struck a surface-to-air missile site in Bandar Abbas that was targeting U.S. warplanes. Two well-placed sources told Griffin the strikes do not indicate the ceasefire is over.
The strike occurred roughly 48 hours before it was reported publicly. Iranian media were under pressure not to publish the story to avoid disrupting ongoing ceasefire negotiations, according to sources familiar with the situation, which accounts for the gap between the operation and its public disclosure.
Larak Island sits at the narrowest point of the Strait of Hormuz, the waterway through which roughly one-fifth of the world’s seaborne oil trade once flowed daily before the conflict began. The island has served as a critical IRGC Navy staging point throughout the crisis, hosting fast-attack craft that can reach passing cargo ships within minutes and providing Iranian forces with direct visibility over virtually every vessel transiting the strait. Since Operation Epic Fury began on February 28, when U.S. and Israeli forces struck Iranian military installations and nuclear facilities, the IRGC has exploited its geographic position over the strait to impose a stranglehold on commercial shipping that continues to reverberate through global energy markets.
Sea mines are one of the most tactically uncomplicated and strategically disruptive weapons available to a naval force operating in a confined waterway. A modern naval mine can be laid in hours and requires no crew to operate once deployed, can remain lethal for weeks, and forces any adversary attempting to clear the strait to conduct slow, dangerous, mine-sweeping operations under potential fire. Iran began laying mines in the strait in the early weeks of the conflict, and by mid-April the U.S. Navy had initiated dedicated mine-clearing operations involving two guided-missile destroyers, the USS Frank E. Petersen and the USS Michael Murphy, working to restore safe passage through the corridor. The continued mine-laying activity near Larak Island on Monday confirms that Iran’s effort to keep the strait hazardous did not end with the ceasefire announcement.
Bandar Abbas, the port city where the surface-to-air missile site struck on Monday was located, serves as Iran’s most important naval base and the primary logistics hub for IRGC operations across the Persian Gulf. The presence of an active SAM site capable of targeting American aircraft over that location illustrates the layered nature of the threat that U.S. forces continue to operate against even under nominal ceasefire conditions. Striking a ground-based air defense system that was illuminating U.S. warplanes falls squarely within the established rules of engagement for self-defense operations, and CENTCOM’s framing of the action as defensive rather than offensive is consistent with how similar strikes have been characterized throughout the conflict.
The timing of the strikes sits in uncomfortable proximity to the diplomatic track. President Trump said on social media on Monday that negotiations with Tehran were “proceeding nicely,” while simultaneously warning that fighting would resume if no deal was reached. The Associated Press reported that an emerging framework for a potential deal would involve Iran’s enriched uranium being destroyed in place or surrendered to an acceptable location, though significant disagreements between Washington and Tehran remain unresolved. Trump has also proposed that any final agreement should include Saudi Arabia, Pakistan, and other regional states joining the Abraham Accords, a condition that adds diplomatic complexity to negotiations already complicated by the active military operations both sides continue to conduct.
The ceasefire that has nominally been in place since the conclusion of Operation Epic Fury on May 5 has not produced a halt in military activity so much as a reduction in its intensity and scope. Both sides have continued to take limited actions within the bounds each has defined as defensive, and the pattern of strikes, mine-laying, and counter-strikes that has characterized the post-ceasefire period suggests that the gap between ceasefire and resumption of full-scale operations remains a matter of political decision rather than military capability.
What Monday’s strikes confirm is that the Strait of Hormuz remains a live operational environment where the rules of engagement are being tested continuously, where Iranian forces are willing to conduct provocative mine-laying operations even during ceasefire negotiations, and where U.S. forces are authorized and prepared to respond with lethal force when those operations pose a direct threat. The narrowest choke point in global energy supply is still contested, still dangerous, and still very much the center of a war that has not yet found its ending.

