- Teledyne FLIR Defense unveiled Rogue 1 Block 2 at SOF Week, doubling operating range to over 12 miles and adding an anti-armor shaped charge payload.
- The upgrade adds 20% more endurance, dual-band radio support, GPS-denied navigation, and a new Android-based ground control system.
Teledyne FLIR Defense announced a major upgrade to its Rogue 1 loitering munition at SOF Week in Tampa, doubling the system’s operating range to more than 12 miles and adding an anti-armor warhead that uses shaped charge jet technology to defeat more heavily protected targets than the original platform could engage.
The Rogue 1 Block 2, unveiled two years after the original system’s debut at SOF Week 2024, incorporates changes driven directly by feedback from the U.S. Marine Corps and U.S. Special Operations Command, both of which have been fielding the weapon in operational programs since its introduction.
The Rogue 1 sits in a category of weapon that has become one of the most militarily consequential innovations of the past decade: the small loitering munition, a drone that flies to a target area, waits for a precise engagement opportunity, and then dives into its target as a guided warhead. Unlike a conventional artillery round or missile that commits to a target the moment it is fired, a loitering munition can be launched, sent to an area of interest, and then directed at a specific target when the operator confirms the engagement, or called off entirely if the situation changes. That combination of range, patience, and precision at a cost far below traditional guided missiles has made loitering munitions a fixture of modern tactical warfare, demonstrated with devastating effect by systems ranging from the Israeli-developed Harop to the Switchblade variants fielded by the U.S. Army and supplied to Ukraine.
The range extension from the original specification to more than 20 kilometers is operationally significant because it determines how far back from the front a launch team can position itself while still reaching targets deep in the threat area. A system with limited range forces operators to move close enough to the front that they face exposure to the same enemy fires they are trying to engage. Doubling that range allows launch teams to work from positions that are considerably safer while maintaining the ability to engage targets that would previously have required a different weapon or a much closer approach. For Marine and special operations units that operate in small teams with limited ability to absorb casualties, that standoff margin is not an abstraction.
The new anti-armor payload using shaped charge jet technology expands the target set Rogue 1 can engage to include vehicles with meaningful armor protection. Shaped charge warheads work by focusing the energy of an explosive into a high-velocity jet of metal that penetrates armor by concentrating force on a small area rather than relying on blast alone, the same principle behind the rocket-propelled grenades and anti-tank guided missiles that infantry forces have carried for decades. Adding this payload option to Rogue 1’s existing family means operators can now select a warhead matched to the target, choosing between anti-personnel, anti-material, and anti-armor options depending on what the mission requires, without switching to a different platform.
Tung Ng, Teledyne FLIR Defense’s vice president of unmanned systems for North America, described the Block 2 upgrades as the next evolution of a system that has already delivered results: “Over the last two years, Rogue 1 has delivered critical successes for customers, and the Block 2 upgrades represent the next evolution of that mission. These advancements prove our commitment to maintaining Rogue 1 as one of the most versatile precision strike options in the warfighter’s kit through a more capable, durable, and future-ready platform.”
Electronic warfare resilience is one of the less visible but increasingly critical dimensions of the Block 2 upgrade. The dual-band radio support added to the system improves both operational range and the platform’s ability to maintain its control link when adversaries attempt to jam communications. Ukraine has documented extensively how Russian electronic warfare systems have disrupted drone control links across the conflict, forcing operators and manufacturers to continuously adapt their communications architecture to remain effective in contested electromagnetic environments. A loitering munition that loses its control link before reaching its target is worse than useless, and Teledyne FLIR’s investment in dual-band radio support reflects the reality that any system intended for serious operational use must be designed from the outset to function in an environment where the adversary is actively trying to shut it down.
The GPS-denied navigation improvements, using both thermal and daylight cameras to maintain orientation when satellite signals are unavailable or spoofed, address the same vulnerability from a different angle. GPS jamming and spoofing have become standard tools in the electronic warfare arsenals of peer and near-peer adversaries, and a weapon that depends entirely on GPS for navigation becomes unreliable in exactly the environments where it is most likely to be needed. The dual-camera navigation approach gives the Block 2 an alternative path to maintaining accurate flight when GPS is degraded, drawing on the same computer vision techniques that have enabled autonomous navigation in GPS-denied environments for other unmanned platforms.
The new Android-based ground control system simplifies the operator interface, reducing the training burden for soldiers who need to employ the system quickly under pressure. Military technology that requires extensive specialized training creates a bottleneck when units need to expand their capabilities rapidly, and the movement toward Android-based interfaces in multiple defense systems reflects an industry recognition that soldiers already know how to use touchscreen devices and that building on that familiarity reduces the cognitive and training overhead that complex proprietary interfaces impose. Combined with the enhanced onboard autonomy that reduces operator cognitive load during flight, the Block 2 is designed to be more capable and simultaneously easier to use than the system it replaces.

